There is no Free Wi-Fi, but there can be Sustainable Wi-Fi

Today Engadget reported that Free WiFi provider admits to making up 90 percent of its revenues. The company, Gowex, runs networks in 85 cities around the world (according to company WWW pages) offices in Madrid, Paris, London, Buenos Aires and Shanghai. The company claimed that it had developed a sustainable business model for free Wi-Fi based on the idea that company makes its revenues from partnerships with local governments, carriers with Wi-Fi offloading and from premium fees (i.e. selling premium user accounts).

Some may view this as a proof that Gowex's business idea and model did not work, but I would not claim that without looking into if they managed to get any revenues at all. Running company badly and falsifying revenues and accounting are very different things from the actual business idea and model not working.  I actually think that those ideas from where Gowex planned to get revenues are valid ones and they seem to have made real roaming deals with roaming brokers such as iPass, Boingo etc. These revenues could then be used to subsidise the service costs of running WiFi networks or related services, but naturally the company should get more revenues from the service it provides than the costs of producing it. And that is actually why I do not believe Free Wi-Fi exists.



The Free Wi-Fi is an illusion for consumers. Somebody always ends up with the bill. It may be the company, organisation or city providing or buying the Free Wi-Fi service out of hospitability. It may be an airport or a shopping mall deploying or buying a service for tracking customer movements or web surfing, but like many other free Internet services, Free Wi-Fi is not really free. You as a consumer may think that with Free Wi-Fi that you are still customer, but the reality is that the one providing and paying for Free Wi-Fi service, needs to get enough benefits and/or revenue from providing the free service to you and their benefit maybe the data about you.

Where Gowex was on a right is that providing Wi-Fi for free needs to be sustainable. The Wi-Fi network service needs to provide so much benefits for the one paying for it, that the payer is willing to cover the costs of running, maintaining and developing the network. Too often in many hospitability guest networks (hotel/conference Wi-Fi, company guest Wi-Fi) the deployed network may serve its users when it was first deployed, but the development of it (Internet bandwidth capacity, better radios) is neglected until enough users are complaining about it. In city-wide Wi-Fi networks similar kind of problems occur, when city-wide Wi-Fi is setup with development project money from government or EU without any plan how to cover the costs after the development project has ended.

Sustainable Wi-Fi networks should be planned so that they can be maintained and even developed with the revenues coming from organisations and companies benefitting from the network service, or from something measurable the network provides. There even exists a successful example of this kind of sustainable global Wi-Fi network concept -- eduroam (*).

In eduroam, universities, research institutions, government organisations and even cities have seen the benefits of joining their existing Wi-Fi networks via federated RADIUS authentication and providing this way a free Wi-Fi around the world for researchers, teachers and students. Every organisation deploys, maintains and develops their own network service with their own funding and shares it with the other eduroam organisations. There is no single vendor, service provider or organisation controlling anything. Instead, every vendor, service provider or organisation which is ready to fulfil the open requirements and standard interfaces is welcome to join or provide equipment or services to other eduroam organisations. There are not a lot of revenues or profits moved around, just normal network and authentication business for companies, but the benefits are clear for participants to justify the costs of basically running the Wi-Fi networks, which they are going to do anyway.

eduroam is real, sustainable Wi-Fi and I am hoping that we (Arch Red and Open System Consultants) may help in bringing its benefits also to wider audience in a very near future. eduroam itself still limits its use to universities and research organisations and networks and cannot unfortunately yet be used as a common global concept to provide sustainable Wi-Fi for all.



* eduroam is a registered trademark of TERENA. Arch Red and Open System Consultants are independent of TERENA".

Building a mobile eduroam access point with RadSec and OpenWRT

A mobile Wi-Fi access point is a very useful way to both demonstrate and extend existing community network coverage over any third-party broadband connections. The problem usually is how the authentication traffic can be transferred over Internet jungle and secured from eavesdropping and man-in-the-middle attacks. Often this is done by deploying VPN solutions such as OpenVPN, but a new IETF draft, RadSec, makes it possible to achieve same security and functionality without having to rely on the use of VPNs.

Figure 1: the mobile eduroam access point network architecture

It has been in my plans to write this article for a while now, but now finally Easter holidays gave the opportunity to finalise the configuration and some free time to write these configuration instructions. This blog post describes how you can build a mobile eduroam access point by utilising RadSec and a popular open source access point firmware called OpenWRT. The network architecture is presented in the Figure 1 above and the rest of the instructions follow below.

The first thing to do is of course install OpenWRT on your access point. There are several different OpenWRT supported access point models and the installation instruction vary between models and manufacturers. In this case I assume that you have alredy OpenWRT based access point installed and continue from the actual eduroam and RadSec configuration.

The base OpenWRT distribution does not come with all the software we will require so we need a working Internet connection to install some additional packages. The most important of these are the tools for time synchronisation (for certificate validity verification) and radsecproxy for RadSec functionality.

From the OpenWRT command line you can install the needed packages by giving the following commands:

# opkg update
# opkg upgrade
# opkg install radsecproxy
# opkg install ntpclient

I recommend rebooting the access point and verifying the correct time with date command. The default OpenWRT timezone is UTC so the time is likely to be hours off from your local time. You can change the timezone, hostname and remote logging address from /etc/config/system displayed below:

config system
        option hostname mobile-ap
        option timezone UTC
        # remote syslog server, we used the syslog configured to radsec server
        option log_ip 10.10.10.10

The wireless settings for eduroam are configured in /etc/config/wireless. The important thing to notice is that the RADIUS server (radsecproxy) will be run on the OpenWRT access point.

config wifi-device  wl0
        option type     broadcom
        option channel  5 
        option country  FI
        # REMOVE THIS LINE TO ENABLE WIFI:
        # option disabled 1

config wifi-iface
        option device           wl0
        option network          lan
        option mode             ap
        # in case you are already running eduroam in your organisation you might
        # want to consider different ssid to prevent causing denial of service for
        # your users
        option ssid             eduroam

        option encryption       mixed-wpa
        # as we use radsecproxy on localhost for converting RADIUS to RADSEC
        # the RADIUS server is the radsexproxy on localhost
        option server           127.0.0.1
        option port             1812
        option key              RadiusSecretHere
        option nasid            nas.id.here
        option wpa_group_key    600
        option ieee80211d       1

Radsecproxy is an open source implementation of the RadSec protocol. The RadSec protocol is essentially TLS-secured RADIUS over TCP making it more reliable and more secure for setting up connections over unreliable or unsecure networks (such as most Internet connections).

There are however few pre-requirements for configuring RadSec and eduroam:

• Home organisation must be part of the national eduroam federation and international confederation to have an access to eduroam infrastructure
  
• a RadSec capable server (either radsecproxy (also on server side) or commercial RadSec capable server such as Radiator)
  
• existing Certificate Authority (CA) for signing certificates for RadSec server and clients
  

In our company we already had Radiator RADIUS server and own CA configured so making certificates and server configuration was not very difficult. The client side (OpenWRT) configuration was done in the /etc/radsecproxy.conf file.:

listenUDP               127.0.0.1:1812
ListenAccountingUDP     127.0.0.1:1813

# Optional log level. 3 is default, 1 is less, 4 is more
LogLevel                3
#Optional LogDestinatinon, else stderr used for logging
# Logging to file
#LogDestination         file:///tmp/rp.log
# Or logging with Syslog. LOG_DAEMON used if facility not specified
# The supported facilities are LOG_DAEMON, LOG_MAIL, LOG_USER and
# LOG_LOCAL0, ..., LOG_LOCAL7

# Syslog is nice as you can direct it to external host via OpenWRT's
# system configuration
LogDestination          x-syslog:///log_daemon

tls mobile-ap-to-radsec-server {
    # In Arch Red we have multiple levels of CA servers with root CA and server CA
    # so the CACertificateFile is a bundle of root CA and server CA. The server CA
    # is the actual CA certifying both the server and mobile-ap certificates.
    CACertificateFile    /etc/certs/ca-servers-bundle-cert.pem
    CertificateFile     /etc/certs/mobile-ap-cert.pem
    CertificateKeyFile  /etc/certs/mobile-ap-key.pem
    # Optionally enable CRL checking
    # CRLCheck on
    # Optionally specify how long CAs and CRLs are cached, default forever
    # CacheExpiry 3600
}

# configuration for OpenWRT's local RADIUS
client 127.0.0.1 {
        type    udp
        # the secret between OpenWRT nas/hostapd and radsecproxy
        secret  RadiusSecretHere
}

# in the real configuration the IP address of the RadSec server
server 10.10.10.10 {
        type    TLS
        # the RADIUS shared secret between mobile-ap and RadSec server
        secret  SecretBetweenMobileAPandRadServer
        port    2083
        tls     mobile-ap-to-radsec-server
        certificateNameCheck off
        matchCertificateAttribute CN:/^radsecserver\.hostname\.here$/
        retryCount      3
        retryInterval   5
}

# The realm below is equivalent to /.*
realm * {
        # the IP addresses of the RadSec server
        server 10.10.10.10 
        accountingServer 10.10.10.10
}

I copied the necessary (CA and client) certificates manually to a directory /etc/certs I had created on the wireless access point file system. A larger deployment of RadSec access points would of course require either a scalable way to deploy and install client certificates or utilising only one client certificate for all mobile access points. Solving this issue can however be a topic for paper or some future blog post, when actual need arises. I did not yet configure the certificate revokation list (CRL) retrieval, but it is in my plans to document also this aspect.

Right, so now we have the actual configuration pretty much set up and we can start testing. Before running radsecproxy as a service I did a prelimanry testing by running it on OpenWRT console with the following command:

# radsecproxy -c /etc/radsecproxy.conf -d 3 -f

I was now able to check if the radsecproxy was able to connect to the home organisation RADIUS server and thus verify the radsecproxy configuration. After this was verified I enabled the radsecproxy permanently with the following command:

# /etc/init.d/radsecproxy enable

Then I rebooted the access point and verified once again that time was correct, radsecproxy was running as a daemon and wireless settings were correct before proceeding to eduroam authentication tests using my own TUT user account.

Like you have probably guessed, the testing was successful and I was able to now have my own mobile eduroam access point to be deployed wherever I may roam. :) Of the difficulties I ran into while doing this, I think the most difficult was once again setupping and configuring the X.509 certificates properly. The radsecproxy default was to check if the certificate CN contained the IP address mentioned in the server block and I had to check from the documentation how this check could be replaced with hostname check without having to use DNS hostname in the configuration block. The result is documented above there in the radsecproxy configuration.

RadSec as a technology felt very solid and functional for connecting devices and services to eduroam and the radsecproxy open source implementation was so well implemented and documented that I think it could be used as an official open source implementation to join to the eduroam federation with RadSec and this way as a roaming proxy replacing for example FreeRADIUS. Even the current radsecproxy implementation has better functionality set (for example dead realm marking) for eduroam proxy usage than the current FreeRADIUS has.

<commercial>Or then again, you can get a Radiator RADIUS+RADSEC server from us, Open System Consultants or some other reseller.</commercial>

eduroam(tm) expands in Japan

RADIUS based authentication roaming federation eduroam(tm) expands in Japan according to Terena's translated news item. The expansion is done in cooperation between the Japanese National Institute of Informatics (NII) and Livedoor, a Japanese provider of commercial WLAN services.

These kind of cooperation announcements give additional validation to Arch Red's vision on utilising eduroam(tm) tried technology to increase community network coverage through roaming instead of building overlapping Wi-Fi networks or trying to form only one dominating one.

RADIUS Roaming: Issues and Solutions presentation in the TREX 2009 seminar

In a moment I will have a presentation in a TREX Internet exchange point's seminar about RADIUS roaming and the issues and proposed solutions -- both current and the future prospects. The presentation covers the path from simple RADIUS usage to a more complex RADIUS roaming situation today.

The presentation is available here:
Karri Huhtanen, Arch Red Oy: RADIUS Roaming: Issues and Solutions

A Community Networks and Wireless Tampere presentation at TERENA Networking Conference 2008

As a part of my PhD studies and community networks related research I keep a presentation at Terena 2008 Networking Conference in 7B - Who is there? - eduroam session. The session is streamed to the network at 17:00-18:30 Finnish time (UTC+3) and can be watched in real time here. The topic of my presentation is: Utilising eduroam in building wireless community networks. The presentation will be archived and will be available also later in case you absolutely do not want to miss it. :)